The site has a new comments policy

Due to circumstances beyond my control, I have been forced to modified the Comments Policy. You can read the new temporary policy here.

Comments on the comments policy are welcome, as are applications for the job of Comments Editor.



  1. Ronnie Wayne says:

    Good news that the site is progressing.
    Interesting position for the right person. Great growth potential.
    I’d recommend Bogman though he may be a still working stiff like me with not the time to consider applying.
    Maybe a young accolade of a top respected researcher or author?
    As a professor Emeritus does Dr. Scott still have GA’s?
    A worthy two year Graduate proposal?

  2. Judgelrg says:

    About time. I have stopped reviewing this site because the few times I made a comment I was blasted. The last time by the comments editor. Generally my comments called for civility.

  3. Tom S. says:
    Tom S.

    May 26, 2016 at 10:35 pm

    Judgelrg, you’re entitled to your opinion. Your criticism includes commentors presenting with their names. You’ve submitted eighteen comments under the alias, “LRG” and your two most recent comments as Judgelrg. I know what I am getting when I approve a comment by either of the dueling Doctors. They’re real, maybe too real to read without being appalled. If you don’t mind my asking, which alias is appalled, today?

    Amen, Judgelrg! I wonder why Jeff took so long to roll out “2.0”.

  4. Judgelrg says:

    Tom thanks for reminding why I choose not to return .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In seeking to expand the range of informed debate about the events of 1963 and its aftermath, welcomes comments that are factual, engaging, and civil. more