Another JFK motorcade reconstruction and the limits of forensic evidence

While reviewing Mark Tyler’s Motorcade 63, I thought of Dale Myers’ 3D animation reconstruction of President Kennedy’s motorcade on November 22, 1963. Myer’s work is the most sophisticated effort to update the official story of the Warren Commission that a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, killed the president for no reason.

While visually elegant, Myer’s presentation still suffers from a fundamental defect. As a forensic presentation, it cannot answer why the president was killed. But its conclusive claims that Kennedy was killed by a lone gunman are part and parcel of the argument that nature of the gunfire in Dealey Plaza had nothing do with the subsequent murder of Oswald, the FBI’s destruction of evidence, the FBI’s twisting of eyewitness testimony, and the CIA cover-up of just how much certain senior operations officers knew about Oswald’s travels, politics, and contacts in the weeks before JFK was killed. That strikes me as highly improbable.

If the case was so simple forensically, why so much duplicity? Compared to a truly forensically simple case like the attempted assassination of Presidennt Ronald Reagan, the JFK’s assassination is quite complex. The desire to simplify it, while understandable emotionally and politically, needs to be resisted for factual reasons.

If Oswald truly acted alone, any one of those things might have happened–The fact that they all happened–and that the CIA is still withholding thousands of JFK files–strike me as a pretty strong indicator that the government has something to hide about the gunfire in Dealey Plaza. If the government has nothing to hide, why is it they hiding so much decades later?

Myer’s reconstruction, while visually elegant, does not quite explain the physical or the eyewitness evidence. The claim that wounds in the two men lined up in a way that makes the dubious “single bullet theory” theoretically possible is presented as scientific fact. It isn’t. The reconstruction shows it is possible that the wounds were caused by one bullet. But the bullet that allegedly caused seven wounds in the two men was hardly damaged. And Texas Governor John Connally and his wife were both quite certain that the two men were hit by two different bullets. In other words, it’s possible that Myer’s reconstruction of the gunfire is wrong.

Tyler’s 2D presentation–while I think it scants the evidence of a shot from a front (such as the testimony of the late Dr. Robert McClelland)–makes more modest claims and leaves room for different interpretations.

2 comments

  1. Jill says:

    you are right Jeff ! since 56 years they are too many firewalls , too many lies … put across everywhere to access at the true , Only inside powerful people can do that for so long . Did you read the last book of Nobel prize Vargas Llosa “Tiempos recios” ( only in spanish now ) about the assassination in 1957 of Guatemala president Castillo Armas ?The modus – operandi of the crime have many similitudes with JFK , the killer a you communist who kill himself just after , the Allan Dulles and CIA involvement to prepare and to cover the crime …Castillo Armas death is still a mystery . Vargas llosa wrote that Allan Dulles use Rafael Trujillo secret service gun for hire to do the job : Johnny Abbes and Henry Pugibet . May be some of the true is in that direction

  2. Anders Sellstedt says:

    But if the second Bullet didn’t hit the governor, where did it go? 1st one missed, 2nd one hit jfk in the back, exited thru the throat. Then there is a fourth one if I read between the lines of what you think, and the fourth one was the killshot. Owning to the angle between the car and the snipers nest, it must have been lodged into the back of the car seat that the governor was sitting in if it didn’t him and me knowingly there is nothing to support that.

    I’ve dony my fair of shooting, with military grade bullets (ex.soldier) and the way bullet no 2 behaved is what I would say expected behavior. It first hits Kennedy in the back, exits thru the throat. It is already unstable so when it hits the governor it is at an angle, exits below his right nipple, enters his hand, exits hand and gets lodged into leg. There are many other things that are way more strange than that so in my opinion, that is probably what happened.

    The question, in my opinion, is the killshot, not the 2nd shot, and that one is a little bit harder to debunk because I can never win an argument about if evidence has been tampered with etc but the 2nd shot is all plausible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In seeking to expand the range of informed debate about the events of 1963 and its aftermath, JFKFacts.org welcomes comments that are factual, engaging, and civil. more

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.