What do the 9/11 report and a CIA history have in common?

George Will exposes one of the tricks of U.S. national security agencies use to protect themselves from embarrassment.

Documents can be kept forever secret by government agencies declaring them “drafts” or otherwise “deliberative.”

Source: 9/11 Report & CIA Bay of Pigs History Should Be Declassified

8 comments

  1. Adam says:

    Clearly more transparency would help our democracy. How could it hurt to have complete transparency from all law enforcement & intelligence from the 1960’s ? even the 70’s ? Are we hiding tricks of the trade that other countries that still can’t figure out ? Protecting the reputations of passed on or aged agents ? From what ? Risking the anger of the American people ? Why would we get angry…..? I would also Love much more transparency for more recent times. Might help a whole lot make sense.

  2. theNewDanger says:

    What do the 9/11 report and a CIA history have in common?

    They are both based on lies.

  3. Bill Banks says:

    National Security Archive piece may be of interest, especially Document 8 with Bissell accused of lying “up and down”–that is to superiors and subordinates. And, at long last, a specific reason (an airfield) for landing at the Bay of Pigs.

    http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB341/

  4. Jordan says:

    How about: “What do the WC Report and the 9/11 Commission Report have in common?”

    Aside from the similar “flaws” in their development, I think that the 28 pages removed or heavily redacted from the 9/11 Commission Report are reflective of deceitfulness.

    • “I think that the 28 pages removed or heavily redacted from the 9/11 Commission Report are reflective of deceitfulness.”~Jordan

      Yes certainly, but in the overall scheme of things the “28 pages” gambit seems almost certain a modified limited hangout.

      Could the Saudi’s stood down the interceptors on 9/11? Could the Saudi’s have wired the towers with explosives? Could the Saudi’s have ran the coverup and whitewash of NIST, or the Commission, or the mainstream Public Relations Regime?

      Don’t forget that Saudi Arabia is a client state of the Western Empire and not visa versa.

      19 hijackers? There is absolutely no proof that any of these clowns actually boarded those planes. The al Qaeda “terror organization” is a CIA cut out…a subsidiary of US Intel.

      See: https://hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2015/09/18/911-false-flag-psyop/

      This page has links to dozens of articles by experts in many fields that can open your eyes to the real story of 9/11.
      \\][//

    • theNewDanger says:

      The 28 pages are a “get into Saudi Arabia free” card.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In seeking to expand the range of informed debate about the events of 1963 and its aftermath, JFKFacts.org welcomes comments that are factual, engaging, and civil. more

%d bloggers like this: