8 thoughts on “What do the 9/11 report and a CIA history have in common?”

  1. How about: “What do the WC Report and the 9/11 Commission Report have in common?”

    Aside from the similar “flaws” in their development, I think that the 28 pages removed or heavily redacted from the 9/11 Commission Report are reflective of deceitfulness.

    1. “I think that the 28 pages removed or heavily redacted from the 9/11 Commission Report are reflective of deceitfulness.”~Jordan

      Yes certainly, but in the overall scheme of things the “28 pages” gambit seems almost certain a modified limited hangout.

      Could the Saudi’s stood down the interceptors on 9/11? Could the Saudi’s have wired the towers with explosives? Could the Saudi’s have ran the coverup and whitewash of NIST, or the Commission, or the mainstream Public Relations Regime?

      Don’t forget that Saudi Arabia is a client state of the Western Empire and not visa versa.

      19 hijackers? There is absolutely no proof that any of these clowns actually boarded those planes. The al Qaeda “terror organization” is a CIA cut out…a subsidiary of US Intel.

      See: https://hybridrogue1.wordpress.com/2015/09/18/911-false-flag-psyop/

      This page has links to dozens of articles by experts in many fields that can open your eyes to the real story of 9/11.
      \\][//

  2. Clearly more transparency would help our democracy. How could it hurt to have complete transparency from all law enforcement & intelligence from the 1960’s ? even the 70’s ? Are we hiding tricks of the trade that other countries that still can’t figure out ? Protecting the reputations of passed on or aged agents ? From what ? Risking the anger of the American people ? Why would we get angry…..? I would also Love much more transparency for more recent times. Might help a whole lot make sense.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top