The last of the Cuban 5: why Cuba and the U.S. can’t make peace

Fernando Gonzalez

Fernando Gonzalez, Cuban intelligence officer goes free on Feb. 27.

A man named Fernando Gonzalez is scheduled to walk out of an Arizona prison on Thursday, and the Cuban Five, a group of Cuban intelligence officers convicted of espionage in 2001, will be down to three, since another defendant, Rene Gonzalez was released in 2011.

The Cuban 5 have been lionized by the government in Havana and demonized by the media in Miami. Their ordeal embodies the tortured relationship that has governed U.S.-Cuba relations since the presidency of John F. Kennedy.

(See “From July 26 to November 22 to today,” JFK Facts, February 9, 2014)

Of the remaining Cuban 5 prisoners, Antonio Guerrero, is scheduled to be released on September 18, 2017, and Ramón Labañino on October 30, 2024.

Gerardo Hernandez

Gerardo Hernandez will remain in U.S. prison indefinitely.

But the last of the Cuban 5, Gerardo Hernandez, has no release date. He is serving two life sentences, one for espionage conspiracy, which seems excessive, and one for conspiracy to commit murder, which was simply wrong.

While the release of Gonzalez removes one small irritant in U.S.-Cuba relations, the indefinite incarceration of Hernandez shows that the political dispute between Washington and Havana has gone beyond truth and justice down to nonsense.

The making of the Cuban 5

On February 24, 1996, three Cessna aircraft of the Miami-based organization Brothers to the Rescue (BTTR) were intercepted by Castro’s military jets. While flying away in international airspace near Cuba, two Cessnas were shot down with rockets and four people died. The third Cessna escaped.

The Cuban government had no tolerance for BTTR’s aerial adventurism because the group’s leader and founder, Jose Basulto, was the gunman in an attempt by the CIA-funded Cuban Student Directorate to assassinate Castro at a seaside Havana hotel in August 1962. They regarded any unauthorized incursion of BTTR planes in Cuban airspace as an imminent danger and had repeatedly warned U.S. officials to rein in the group.

CIA-funded group attempted to assassinate Castro in August 1962.

In Washington, where Basulto’s past as a terrorist was unknown, Brothers to the Rescue was seen as a band of martyrs.  The U.S. Congress passed a law deeming the Feb. 1996 shootdown “tantamount to cold-blooded murder” and urging President Clinton “to seek, in the International Court of Justice, indictment for this act of terrorism by Fidel Castro.”

That never happened because the facts of the shootdown did not support the charge.

In 2001, five Cubans who spied on BTTR on behalf of the Cuban intelligence service were indicted in Miami on a prima face case of espionage.

Gerardo Hernandez, the ringleader of the group known by the code name GIRO, was additionally charged of conspiracy to commit the “unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought” (18 U.S.C. §§ 1111, 1117).

The charge was that Hernandez had aided and abetted the shootdown by conveying massages to specify when the other Cuban agents (who had infiltrated BTTR) were flying with the group and to warn them not to fly unscheduled.

By doing so, he singled out other BTTR members for attack, or so the government’s theory held.

The conspiracy that wasn’t

Criminal conspiracy, in its essence, is an agreement to achieve an intended objective, not the result.

Jose Basulto, leader of Brothers to the Rescue.

Hernandez was tried for what he purportedly agreed to do, regardless of whether a crime “tantamount to cold-blooded murder” ultimately occurred. Even if he would have intended to aid and abet in a plan to destroy the BTTR Cessnas, but in an erroneous belief — and Hernandez did believe it — that Cuba was lawfully acting, his agreement to commit such justified killing would have not constituted the offense.

Indeed, Hernandez was a non-decision maker intelligence officer who played a messenger role by warning other agents. He neither caused the BTTR flights nor encouraged them.

His foreknowledge of the possibility of a Cuban attack was in the public domain: Castro’s government had repeatedly said the Cuban Air Force might attempt to shoot down the BTTR aircraft if they kept on violating Cuban airspace.

Hernandez would have never believed that Castro would take action against BTTR in an illegal manner, because Cuba would have been then exposed to a crushing U.S. retaliation. Furthermore, nobody could have ever agreed to what really happened in the skies off Cuba on Feb. 24, 1996. It was a tragic border incident.

Both the ICAO investigation and the U.S. radars revealed that the two downed Cessnas would have imminently entered Cuban airspace heading toward Havana and away from their planned flight path. They were following the other Cessna, which had already entered Cuban airspace. At 540 mph, two Cuban jets intercepted them, first with a warning pass and then with missile fire.

The pilots of the Cuban jets either exceeded the limits or miscalculated by less than a minute the invisible line of the national border. That’s why the U.S. government did not seek an indictment against Castro in the International Court of Justice. That’s why also the inference that Hernandez had foreknowledge of a plan to commit an “unlawful killing” — in international airspace — is false.

A flawed defense strategy

But when Hernandez came to trial, his attorney’s defense actually bolstered the prosecution’s case by heightening the political theater of the shootdown.

His counsel Paul McKenna argued, in essence, that Cuba was right about everything leading to the shootdown and that the victims from Brother to the Rescue themselves had it coming to them. Instead of defending Hernandez against the charge of conspiracy, McKenna defended Castro against the charge of  murder.

The result was that three quarters of the Cuban Five’s trial was devoted to where the shootdown had taken place, although it was irrelevant to the charge of conspiracy. Since his 29 February 2001motion to dismiss it, McKenna pinned his defense upon the thesis that the shootdown occurred in Cuban airspace and linked GIRO’S fate to proving that the actions of others were lawful.

It was in itself quixotic. McKenna set out to convince the jurors that they should believe that the Cuban radar data — based on onion skin drawings — were more accurate than those electronically recorded by the U.S. radar.

The coup de grace to Hernandez’s defense came when McKenna’s sole expert witness, US Air Force Col. David Buchner, couldn’t explain why the coordinates he had received from the Cuban government for the trial were noticeably different from those provided by the own Cuban government to ICAO in 1996.

On June 8, 2001, Hernandez was convicted by a jury that — quite remarkably — was never told by anyone that he must have intended the killing in order to have committed the offense.

He remains imprisoned in a federal prison in California.

Fernando Gonzalez will presumably return to Cuba where he can expect the government to give him a hero’s return.

But the dispute between the U.S. and Cuban governments, now in its sixth decade, won’t reach a satisfactory resolution if the persistent pursuit of narrow political goals obfuscates relevant issues, hinders justice, and inflames passions in disregard of common sense.

 

7 comments

  1. Melvin Fromme says:

    Fascinating story. With one of the Cuban 5 about to be released I can envision Paul McKenna packing his bags.

  2. Jonathan says:

    Jeff, it appears from our post Gerardo Hernandez’s conviction was not appealed. If it wasn’t, a screaming question is, why not?

    A primary ground for appeal in a criminal case is error in instructions the judge gives to the jury. From what you write, it appears the trial judge made errors as to the law of conspiracy and as to jury instructions.

    What you describe doesn’t amaze me, but it should outrage all readers here.

    • ARNALDO MIGUEL FERNANDEZ says:

      The story went on with a successful appeal before a three-judge panel, but the Court of Appeals rejected it in plenary session. Althoug Judge Phillys Kravitch wrote a well-reasoned 15-pages dissenting opinion, the Supreme Court abstained from reviewing the case. It seems that the charge of conspiracy to commit murder prevailed because the defense´s claim of lack of U.S. jurisdiction on the shootdown was considered strategic choice not subjected to review in the adversary process.

  3. Mayra Solloa says:

    Just today, the Miami Herald reported that a lawsuit demanding to submit evidence of murder against Fidel and Raúl Castro to a grand jury was rejected by federal Judge Donald H. Graham. The petitioner is Melson Morales, brother of Pablo Morales, one of the four people killed in the shootdown. Murder charges are filed against Brigadier General Ruben Martinez Puente, who commanded Cuba’s air forces in 1996, and the MiG´s pilots Lorenzo Alberto and Francisco Pérez. But there is no indictment against the Castro brothers.

    A notice of appeal has been filed to the 11th Circuit Court in Atlanta. Former U.S. Attorney Kendall B. Coffey and Brothers to the Rescue leader Jose Basulto had presented much of the evidence in 2008, but Judge Graham ruled Morales himself must present the evidence. Fidel Castro personally approved the shootdown and his spy service codenamed the mission “Operation Scorpion.”

  4. Jonathan says:

    Criminal law: If Party A performs act X believing act X is lawful, and it turns out act X is a crime, has Party A committed a crime?

    ANSWER: It depends on the ELEMENTS of the crime. If the crime does not require a specific intent (e.g., statutory rape) and is an absolute liability crime, yes, Party A has committed a crime. Contra if the crime requires a specific intent (e.g., signing a false tax return not knowing it is false).

    CONSPIRACY is a different critter in the criminal law. The only TWO ELEMENTS of conspiracy are (a) an agreement to commit a crime by two or more persons, and (b) an act in furtherance of the agreement b one of the parties. Conspiracy law doesn’t have a SPECIFIC INTENT requirement. That’s how Hernandez got nailed.

    This is technical criminal law stuff. It’s pretty clear to me that although the trial judge applied the correct law, Hernandez’z defense attorney made some poor judgments in how to argue Hernandez’s defense. But I’m a distant bystander.

    • Arnaldo M. Fernandez says:

      Thanks, Johnathan.
      The defense played right into the prosecutor´s hands. The U.S. was not obliged to prove that there was a plan to shoot down the BTTR planes in unlawful manner and that Hernandez knew of the unlawfulness of the plan.
      The defense’s strategy led directly to simplify the case thusly: if the Cuban MiGs pilots shot down the planes as justified last resort against military incursion, then Hernandez shouldn’t be convicted.
      It was an insult to the common sense the rewriting of the shootdown history by the defense. I think the key should have been to prove that there wasn’t any agreement with unlawful objectives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In seeking to expand the range of informed debate about the events of 1963 and its aftermath, JFKFacts.org welcomes comments that are factual, engaging, and civil. more

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

vape: humble juice wood vape tank vape cyber monday deals drag 2 platinum vape pen hookah 3mg nicotine equals how many cigarettes 3000mah vape battery voopoo too custom cover best refillable 510 cartridges smok alien carrying case vapor distillation what are the biggest ecig brands why cant i taste my vape juice prohibition vape juice envy e cigarette review how much does it cost to start vaping buy e cigarette india online 24mg nicotine vape juice mistic ecigarettes voopoo drag mini 2 117w tc box mod infinix pods rba sub ohm tank vapr shop e cigarette shops sydney replacement tanks vapor pen replacement parts mini snow wolf best nic salt device 2019 new vape coil tastes burnt buy rove vape pen online how to clean suorin drop mark ten 200 watt box mods will vaping set off smoke alarms tfv12 prince glass make your own mech mod fuchai 213 problems g pen pods regulated tube mods 2016 smok koopor primus 300w uwell crown iv coils top e cigarette uwell crown 3 incandescent purple falcon tank uwell crown take apart e cig mod starter kit uwell crown too hot uwell crown 2 rebuildable deck voopoo drag lock unlock best vape pens for cbd oil skeletal voopoo drag purp vape juice voopoo drag two arctic horizon tech tank

weight loss: workouts for weight loss quick weight loss center diet blog treadmill workout for weight loss water fast for weight loss lunch ideas for weight loss top ten diet pills over the counter eric greenspan weight loss best diet pills in mexico yoga weight loss stories best thyroid medication for weight loss hypothyroidism weight loss supplements top appetite suppressant qigong for weight loss parsley and lemon juice for weight loss japan weight loss weight loss diet for teenage guys upasana kamineni weight loss weight loss montgomery al red tea for weight loss weight loss pills like oxyelite pro ativan and weight loss vitamin b12 and weight loss hypnosis weight loss youtube vitamins to help you loose weight arginine and ornithine for weight loss dash diet for weight loss 1200 calories what to drink for weight loss quick weight loss center atlanta weight loss pills 2018 food substitutes for weight loss best caffeine free weight loss pills b6 weight loss working weight loss pills yoga poses for weight loss hca diet pills ionamin diet pills buy adipex diet pills online weight loss contests for money purple and white diet pills spells for weight loss zhen shou diet pills vitamin d 50000 iu weight loss lose weight pills at walgreens diet pills that work for women fast quick 1 week weight loss eating one meal a day weight loss extenze shots cranberry juice and weight loss what is pure garcinia weight loss center dallas testosterone male enhancement chinese weight loss secret beach body supplements inbee park weight loss

exam: Help To Pass 9A0-058 Exam Guide Online Sale, Examcollection 9A0-081 Training Guide Online Sale, The Most Recommended 642-979 Exam Dumps Pdf With 100% Pass Rate, Sale Latest 500-210 Certificate On Store, Most Important EX0-116 Certificate On Our Store, Helpful FL0-120 Pdf Sale, Certforall 70-385 Book Are Based On The Real Exam, Free HP0-M56 Self Study On Sale, Certleader M2020-229 Certification Online Sale, ITexam-Answers 000-416 Dump For Sale, Sale Best 000-253 Vce , Certshared 000-M197 Exam Prep UP To 50% Off, Sale Best C2180-319 Study Guide Is Updated Daily, New Release C2180-277 Exam Topics Latest Version PDF&VCE, Sale 000-M45 Exam Prep 100% Pass With A High Score, Test-inside 000-N38 Training Guide With 100% Pass Rate, ITexam-Answers 70-573 Test Questions With The Knowledge And Skills, Certshared 070-403 Test With Low Price, Sale Best MB3-412 Exam On Sale, High Pass Rate E20-542 Exam Dumps Pdf Latest Version PDF&VCE, Passeasy 070-503-CSHARP Self Study , 100% Pass Guarantee 70-506-CSHARP Training For All Candidates From All Over The World, Useful 1Z1-465 Test Exam With The Knowledge And Skills, Sale Best FR Exam Book Is Updated Daily, Ucertify 1Z0-897 Exam Questions And Answers , Latest Updated 310-877 Exam On Sale, Provide New 1z0-489 Answers Are The Best Materials,

cbd oil: cbd sex cbd oil hypothyroid discount cbd oil hope cbd oil colorado online cbd high cbd oil uk premium cbd cbd etsy long term effects of cbd unsweetened cbd oil cbd oil leafly cbd oil legal new york cbd flower wholesale usa lorazepam and weed cbd oil ointment cbd beauty cbd thc vape oil shopify cbd oil pure naturals cbd revelation online alcohol tolerance royal cbd oil human ultracell cbd candy online of mice and men summary naked 100 cbd tincture cbd oil reputable sellers honolulu haze cbd effects cbd stent cbd oil for diabetic wholesale cbd hemp oil benefit definition cbd clinic severe how doy cbd oil and peyronies rev bras psiquiatr elixinol cbd review coconut oil vape examine cbd hemp vape review highest cbd the good one open range smoker cbd bank account can i take cbd oil with lisinopril cbd tolerance break 3mg cbd oil low tsh cbd oil buy cbd oil on line pur7 cbd oil cbd oil promo code cannanine cbd medications that interact with cbd oil isolate direct sleep trial do cbd oil with the cream show up in drug tests oil pros

male enhancement: sex in your area blue chew side effects online pharmacy reddit hydromax 7 enlarge penis pill herbal sex pills most reliable online pharmacy viagra vs revatio enlarg your penis viagra penis size my penis size supplements to increase male sex drive male enhancement pills review how to increase erection time organic male enhancement pills natural erectile dysfunction pills best male enhancement pills at walmart tip of my penis blue pill 10 6 inch girth cock alpha male reviews steroids and erectile dysfunction energy pills that really work the little blue pills penis silicon injection what is roman can viagra kill you increase testosterone in men viagara coupon androzene free trial erectile dysfunction shots cost improve stamina cholesterol and erectile dysfunction lovely lilith viagra falls natural vitamin supplements how to gain testosterone embarrising erection doctor prescribed testosterone definition impotent a good man is hard to find quizlet the best hair loss treatment doctor steven lamm suck my penis exercise for stronger erection benefits of lecithin sexually herbal viagra side effects men in bed with other men penis enlargment exercies boost elite review how to train your penis top 10 male enhancement supplements cheap breast enlargement pills male enhancments exercise for pennis growth