Thoughts on the Willens defense of the Warren Commission

I want to  thank Howard Willens for his willingness to answer questions from JFK Facts. Like most Americans, I cannot share his certitude about the Commission’s findings, and I find my skepticism fortified by his admissions about the “untruthful” and “unresponsive” posture of Richard Helms and James Angleton.

I think Willens’s focus on denying “conspiracy” question serves as a way of avoiding the implications of the CIA’s deceptive stance toward the Warren Commission. If the senior agency officials concealed the Castro assassination plots from the Commission, they could have concealed covert activities — authorized or unauthorized — around Oswald. And there is evidence of a CIA operation around Oswald, namely the October 10, 1963, cable about Oswald’s visit to Mexico City that was signed by three senior officers (John Whitten, Bill Hood, and Tom Karamessines) who had responsibility for authorizing covert operations.

Given the secrecy that still conceals the operational files of CIA officers who were familiar with Oswald’s travel, politics and contacts before JFK’s assassination (David Phillips, Anne Goodpasture) or who ran psychological warfare operations using a CIA-funded group that had collected intelligence on Oswald before the assassination (George Joannides), or who later implicated themselves in the assassination (Howard Hunt, David Morales), it would premature, if not imprudent, to dismiss the possibility of an Oswald operation.

As for the CIA’s assertion that the operational files of these officers are “Not Believed Relevant” to the assassination, this claim remains uncorroborated. Given Willens’s acknowledgement of the CIA’s mendacity toward the Warren Commission, there is no compelling reason to accept such a self-interested and unverified assertion. The peculiar and unnecessary secrecy around ancient files of deceased officers serves to further undermine Willens’s confident claims about what the evidence tells us. We haven’t seen all the evidence, so how can one make definitive judgments about it?

Finally, the legal concept of conspiracy is a narrow lens with which to view the events of November 1963. By focusing on conspiracy, Willens and the Warren Commission spared themselves the burden of addressing the question of whether Kennedy’s death was caused by other factors, such as malfeasance, negligence, or incompetence.

So until we have full disclosure, I have to respectfully disagree with Willens about the causes of JFK’s assassination. I don’t think he is cynical. I think he’s credulous.

6 comments

  1. Bill Simpich says:

    Jeff,

    If you follow up by asking questions to Willens’ colleague
    David Slawson, could you ask him what he meant when he
    wrote “I can explain” next to the written question “why did no one report
    Oswald’s visit to the Cuban consulate until after the assassination”?

    Slawson wrote those three words fifty years ago, and yet no one has asked him that question.

    • Dan says:

      Mr. Slawson appeared at the SMU conference last fall that was carried on C-Span. He stated that in April 1964 he and William Coleman were offered CIA audio tapes of Oswald in Mexico City to listen to. Slawson further stated in answer to a question that he did not credit CIA’s explanations for lack of audio tapes and photographs of Oswald in Mexico City. These would be important points to follow up on.

  2. Jonathan says:

    If you are allowed a follow-up question, I recommend you ask Willens this:

    In your view, what was the purpose of the Warren Commission?

    • leslie sharp says:

      Jonathan, I too wonder about those charged with serving under CJ Earl Warren and what they might have believed to be their mandate. Were they dedicated to uncovering the truth or were their careers of paramount concern … a highly human reaction. The human condition must be factored into any analysis of the Warren Commission Report, the HSCA, etc; it’s no excuse, it is simply the way that it is and was.

      Of paramount interest and concern to me is who in power might have manipulated the Willens’ of the time? Might he be asked if he felt that he was under pressure? With whom was he most directly in contact with during the period? Does he believe that he and others succumbed to the influence of superiors? If so, who might they have been? Is Willens confident that he has analyzed the WC report and subsequent inquiries to the degree that he is certain that Democracy was served? Is Willens willing to put his name on the investigations and assure American citizens that there is no reason to pursue this investigation further?

      We’re are all looking for A Few Good Men. I trust we will know them when we encounter them.

    • Gerry Simone says:

      He’ll probably just quote the preface to the WCR.

  3. echelon says:

    I agree that Howard Willens should be applauded for coming forward to put his opinions on the record. The best disinfectant is full disclosure, but a good second choice is open discussion with respect shown by both sides. I was a bit concerned last year when Robert Blakey was castigated by some researchers and observers for expressing doubts about the investigative process, after a long period of silence.

    It is very important that we get more of the people who have first hand knowledge of these events to speak out. We can express doubts about what they say but we should always encourage them to say it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In seeking to expand the range of informed debate about the events of 1963 and its aftermath, JFKFacts.org welcomes comments that are factual, engaging, and civil. more

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

cbd oil: thc to cbd ratio sleep number benefits cbd oil headache does cbd oil help with cancer cbd thera 42 pure cbd vs full spectrum heka cbd oil how to test thc and cbd levels 4corners cbd cbd edibles denver best hemp cbd oil for anxiety cbd oil legal in new jersey cbd oil ky louisiana cbd laws hawaiian dream cbd can cbd oil help with itchy skin does cbd oil make you test positive for a drug test can stroke patients use cbd oil cbd dist red stripes cbd oil product for sale mg golf equipment miracle gro liquid cbd genetics is cbd oil legal in louisiana 2019 cbd store columbus ga 75 mg cbd vape oil native cbd water can cbd oil fight infection class gold aceite find the right dose of cbd hemp oil how long does cbd oil last in vape pens

male enhancement: wellbutrin testosterone sorry about your penis male libido pills how often can you take sildenafil medications for low testosterone rhino 5 pill estratest reviews how to get bigger balls without pills viagra 100mg taller bigger stronger girl roman ed reviews i have a big dick do steroids shrink your penis red enhancement ingredients in boost drugs similar to viagra 7 eleven male enhancement what is erection penis replacement dick pens granny belly vigrx oil reviews phosphodiesterase inhibitor drug names can penis shrink how to cure erectile dysfunction fast blue facebook pill big weiner ancient herbs tv 58 pills increasing testosterone reddit rino pills biggest asian dick

weight loss: chumlee weight loss 2016 weight loss workout for men infrared sauna weight loss which weight loss pills work best tai chi weight loss weight loss smoothie plan weight loss appetite suppressant 30 day weight loss diet menu st francis weight loss zumba dance for weight loss juice diet for weight loss lime water for weight loss carbohydrates for weight loss free quick weight loss pills meal supplement shakes for weight loss increase metabolism pills will cellulite go away with weight loss top working diet pills weight loss otc pills herbal appetite suppressants weight loss pills in fluoxetine 20 mg weight loss mango african diet pills laxative for weight loss best diet pills ephedra stacker diet pills olio diet pills biggest weight loss quick weight loss for vegetarians liquid weight loss great diet for weight loss hot peppers weight loss

vape: champion vapor 317 vape vamo ecig for sale rebuildable atomizer coils m201 ecig ijoy capo 100w squonk vaping shop duncanville tx how to clean vape pen does vaping have any side effects voopoo drag 2 how to get out of fit mode best vape tanks 2018 best vape battery 18650 smok v8 stick tank voopoo too black turquoise pod devices best place to buy a vape online vaporesso swag 2 when was uwell established suorin price what is tpd uwell vapes starter kit chamomile vape juice nicotine salt e liquid the valyrian uwell smok stick v8 replacement coils vape ban usa caliburn uwell reviews 4 ingredients in vape juice voopoo ben phillips video consider the sodium doublet vapor lines voopoo drag customize sainara sai tips reddit guide harmful chemicals in vape juice

exam: Exam-Labs 412-79 Self Study With 100% Pass Rate, Most Important E22-185 Preparation Materials Is The Best Material, Real E20-500 Study Guide Pdf Are Based On The Real Exam, We Have 000-713 Practice Exam With Accurate Answers, First-hand A4070-603 Questions For Download, Sale Latest A4040-225 Cert Exam For Sale, 100% Success Rate C4040-225 Exam Online Shop, Buy Best M6040-423 Book Online Sale, Examcollection 000-753 Test Prep 100% Pass With A High Score, Real MB6-511 Study Guide Pdf With 100% Pass Rate, Help To Pass NO0-002 Exam Cram For Each Candidate, Experts Revised AHM-520 Exam Preparation Online Store, SelfTestEngine 1Z1-131 New Questions On Sale, 100% Pass Rate 1Z1-354 Certification Exam Are Based On The Real Exam, Sale Latest CSCP Vce Dumps Guaranteed Success, Exam-Labs VCP-510 Practice Test Pdf Online Store,