Crowdsourcing JFK: What did Gerald Ford say about the Warren Commission?

A faithful reader writes:
“I recall see former president and Warren Commission member Gerald Ford make an ‘unusual’ statement on TV in the mid 1990s. In reference to the Warren Commission, he said, ‘We told the truth, we just didn’t tell the whole truth.'”
“Aside from seeing / hearing him say that,” the reader went on. “I recently read a Jan. 1996 interview with James Hosty, Hosty mentions Ford’s remark verbatim and said he wished Ford had said that sooner because he (Hosty) would have used it in his new book at that time before it went into publication (Assignment: Oswald).
“Trying to find that 4-second remark on a YouTube video is like looking for the proverbial needle in a haystack. Do you have any idea how or where I can find the footage of Ford saying that?”
I’m not familiar with that Ford comment. Maybe readers can help. Anybody know anything about this?

21 comments

  1. Dan says:

    There is a Preface by Gerald Ford to a book titled “A Presidential Legacy and the Warren Commission”, Flatsigned Press, Nashville, 2007. In that Preface, President Ford writes that the CIA hid evidence from the Warren Commission about the CIA/Mafia plots to kill Castro, but makes a distinction between being involved in the JFK assassination and covering it up to hide the CIA/Mafia plots. Ford writes, “Given the new facts, could there have been a conspiracy? Conceivably. But no verified evidence to date shows a link to, or any direct involvement by, any government agency, federal employees, or subversive group.” p. XXIII.

    • Gerry Simone says:

      That preface by Ford is very important. If it can’t be published on the internet, perhaps a review by someone who has read it (maybe it’s on Amazon?).

      If Ford indeed mentions a cover-up by the CIA of a CIA/Mafia plot to assassinate the President, then this could be the rationale for the withholding of the last 1,100 files.

  2. Shenon’s book shows that Ford was highly suspicious of a Communist conspiracy.

    Shenon also claims that the WC staff and Commission members never got the SOLO report about Castro saying that Oswald had threatened to kill Kennedy at the Mexican embassy.

    • Bogman says:

      I have to ask, John, if you believe the report that Oswald threatened Kennedy at the Cuban embassy? Because that’s quite an amazing coincidence that the same guy gets a front row seat on the motorcade route six weeks later.

      • I have to ask, John, if you believe the report that Oswald threatened Kennedy at the Cuban embassy?

        I think it’s possible, but if so, the Cubans blew it off as a meaningless rant from a mentally unstable guy.

        I think it’s also possible (and probably more likely) that in the aftermath of the assassination, the account of what Oswald said in the embassy got mangled and distorted.

        You should look at the things Hoover was telling top officials in DC. Information does not seamlessly move up through layers of bureaucracy.

  3. Bogman says:

    I read Ford’s preface and you don’t know whether to think he was clueless or completely disenguous.

    Two pages after telling everyone how bad people are who claim the WC is a fraud, the official report states JFK was first hit in the neck. Does anyone who’ve seen the entry wound in the autopsy photos and clothing believe that’s his “neck?” Are u frigging kidding me? Ask any four-year-old where the neck is and I guarantee you he won’t point to the mid- shoulder.

    But that is so typical of the crap our govt has been serving on this issue for 50 years. Amend an obvious fact to make your case rather than build your case on obvious facts. And then point fingers at everyone who calls you on it.

    That’s why the American people never bought the official story, not because of conspiracy theorists. If Oswald did it alone, then there’s no reason to amend a SINGLE fact.

    And btw, I believe it was Ford who had the wording changed to say JFK was first struck in the neck and not the shoulder.

    • The “Ford moved the wound” business is a factoid.

      http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ford.htm

      • bogman says:

        OK, but what do you think of my main point? If the WC was an honest investigation looking for the truth, why would they lie about the position of the entrance wound? Not too mention never mention the backwards motion of Kennedy in the final shot from Z, etc., etc.

        Do you see how all this confusion about the case was NOT caused by conspiracy theorists?

        • What you are calling “lies” simply were not lies.

          The autopsy report says the wound was 14 cm. below the tip of the right mastoid process. The autopsy photos (which the HSCA had) show it 13.5 cm. below the tip of the right mastoid process.

          As for “back and to the left,” the WC should have dealt with that more explicitly, but it was almost certainly a neuromuscular spasm. Indeed, Shenon’s book makes it clear that WC staff knew that.

          So you need to be careful about labeling as “lies” things that are merely at odds with the standard conspiracist way of interpreting the evidence.

          • bogman says:

            First, I never used the word lies. i also think that most people would agree that anything below the collar line is below the neck which JFK’s wound obviously was. So more subterfuge.

            I’m glad you can dismiss the subterfuge about the Z film from the official report. Inexcusable to me and undernines any integrity they were hoping for.

          • bogman says:

            Also, none of this proves or even means WC conspiracy. It does show a willingness to cherry-pick and massage the facts to match a pre-drawn conclusion, the kind of stuff you call CTs on every day.

          • Ford read a draft that said “A bullet had entered his back at a point slightly above the shoulder to the right of the spine.”

            That’s inconsistent.

            It’s also the case that Ford had seen the Rydberg drawing, and almost certainly did not know what “14 cm. below the tip of the mastoid process” was.

            http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/shootft.htm

            So he believed he was correcting the WCR.

            The final version of the WCR read:

            “A bullet had entered the base of the back of his neck and slightly to the right of his spine.”

            The actual entry was at T1, quite consistent with the SBT.

          • Gerry Simone says:

            The Rydberg sketch is clearly a lie and anything that follows it, especially when one considers the autopsy photo of Kennedy’s back wound or the photos of his jacket and shirt (warning – graphic):

            http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/JFK/ford.html (photos at bottom of article)

            http://www.celebritymorgue.com/jfk/jfk-autopsy.html (third photo down)

            Staff wrote the bullet entered the back which was changed by Ford to ‘base of neck’. This is a big difference. Even if he didn’t have access to the autopsy photos (which I doubt), the FBI’s report described the lower location of the bullet holes in Kennedy’s clothing, which was more than enough to raise an eyebrow.

          • Larry says:

            when someone knowingly states that a wound is in a different place than it actually is that makes it a lie.

      • Brian H says:

        Sorry Mr McAdams but the pictures of the wounds and the Warren Report clearly say otherwise.

      • TLR says:

        Of course we can trust a man who lied under oath.

        During his confirmation hearings for Vice President in November 1973, Gerald Ford was asked about using excerpts from the top secret 1/27/1964 Warren Commission transcript in his book, Portrait of the Assassin. His reply was an utter falsehood.

        Chairman: Now, Mr. Ford, it has been stated that as a member of the Warren Commission you voluntarily accepted the constraints which all the members of the commission accepted, providing that you would not publish or release any of the proceedings of the Commission. You did, however, in association with another, publish a book and provide material for a Life magazine article on the proceedings of the Commission. Do you feel this was a violation of your agreement?

        Ford: To the best of my recollection, Mr. Chairman, there was no such agreement, but, even if there was, the book I published in conjunction with a member of my staff…we wrote the book, but we did not use in that book any material other than the material that was in the 26 volumes of testimony and exhibits that were subsequently made public…

        Later a member of a House committee suggested to Ford that he might have committed perjury during his Senate testimony; Ford said that he hadn’t understood the meaning of the chairman’s question.

  4. jeffmorley says:

    I remind readers that the point of this post is NOT to debate Gerald Ford’s credibility . The point is finding NEW INFORMATION. The reader is looking for video of Ford talking about the Warren Commission. If you have information that can help please send it in the form of a link or a citation.

  5. Andrew Everett says:

    The only similar remarks by Gerald Ford which I could find were on a History Channel documentary of the Warren Commission. Ford stated “It was wise to get it (the Warren Commission Report) to the public before the elections of 1964. We understood it was important to get the report out publicly as quickly as possible–and at the same time do a good job.”

    Obviously, this is far from openly stating the Warren Commission did not tell the whole truth–but it is worth noting that the final 15 minutes of the documentary does go on to question whether the commission was given ample time to find the whole truth. The final portion of the documentary also explains how a member of the Warren Commission, Sen. Richard Russell, saw his own skeptical views obfuscated in the Warren Report.

    So, is it possible that maybe your friend’s memory may be “blending” these final conclusions?

    Also possible is that youtube has stricken the video/remarks from being easily searched (or even taken down the posting). I recently went through my youtube history and was surprised to find quite a few of the videos I have watched are now DELETED. The videos which were deleted had no file name or any way of knowing exactly WHAT was deleted–just a blank box that said “this video has been removed.”

    Ford’s remarks are at 1 hour 16 min 23 seconds

  6. mark says:

    If the WC was to conduct a serious and thorough investigation, then why would the new president appoint Allen Dulles to be on the commission? All of the details of the assassination are very important, but the debate rages on endlessly. consider an alternative tact; looking at the big picture and using a little common sense. It’s clear that something occurred that day in Dallas other than what the WC report tells us. LBJ appoints Allen Dulles to be on the wc, the very same Allen Dulles that JFK just humiliated by firing him. Wouldn’t the president realize that this conflict of interest could sabotage the report either by mischief or perception? Dulles is the last man on earth that should have been chosen for the WC…………logic and common sense tells me that LBJ was more concerned with having ‘friendly’ WC members and a member with a grudge against Kennedy was better yet. If you don’t agree with that assessment, then you would have to conclude that LBJ was an idiot. He was a bad guy and a crook etc., but he wasn’t an idiot. LBJ puts Dulles on the committee to investigate the murder of a guy that dulles would like to get even with; I believe that wasn’t a blunder but a coverup………..

  7. Gerry Simone says:

    The comment in the link below says that the WC DID have access to the autopsy photos per Jan. 21st and 27th, 1964 executive session transcripts.

    http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1rntfc/gerald_ford_changed_the_draft_of_the_warren/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In seeking to expand the range of informed debate about the events of 1963 and its aftermath, JFKFacts.org welcomes comments that are factual, engaging, and civil. more

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

weight loss: meal prep ideas for weight loss no appetite and weight loss whey protein powder weight loss best girdles for weight loss smoking weight loss dates weight loss loss weight rapidly 120 pound weight loss avocado weight loss smoothie weight loss pills and breastfeeding penis size weight loss a slim diet pills coconut oil pills weight loss reviews best weight loss supplements at gnc best breakfast bars for weight loss consumer report weight loss pills peloton bike weight loss weight loss camp ny kickboxing for weight loss result modere m3 weight loss reviews fun weight loss games josh peck weight loss diet children weight loss programs af plus weight loss pills can turmeric help with weight loss does weight loss 4 pills work does sleep affect weight loss weight loss dietitian arjun kapoor weight loss weight loss soup instant pot keto stalled weight loss sweat weight loss weight loss calculator women quick weight loss exercise plan weight loss and diarrhea in cats hot yoga weight loss stories adhd medication and weight loss new weight loss supplements real weight loss pills that work dr dre weight loss weight loss pills in nigeria otc weight loss pills reviews oxy pills for weight loss best new diet pills 2012 most effective diet pills most powerful weight loss pill china diet pills best diet pills for weight loss 2016 how do i take alli diet pills encouraging words for weight loss one week quick weight loss diet best weight loss meals gina neely weight loss diet 30 diet pills hcg amazon safe weight loss supplements total fuel keto pills garcinia lean

exam: Pass the 9L0-005 Test Dump Latest Version PDF&VCE, To Pass Your Exam 9L0-406 Exam Practice Pdf Latest Version PDF&VCE, Valid and updated 352-001 Training On Our Store, To Pass Your Exam 350-080 Exam Questions And Answers For Sale, 50% OFF 642-279 Vce Software Online Shop, Buy Best 1D0-460 Vce with PDF and VCE Engine, Most Reliable CWNA-106 Book Pdf Latest Version PDF&VCE, Pass the HP2-E53 Vce Download Guaranteed Success, Helpful HC-035-340-CHS Preparation Materials Covers All Key Points, Passeasy HC-035-620-CHS Online Exam With Low Price, Offer 000-612 Prep Guide Guaranteed Success, SelfTestEngine HP2-N53 Exam Guide Pdf 100% Pass With A High Score, Experts Revised A4040-129 Certification Answers With Low Price, 100% Real 000-N06 Exam With 100% Pass Rate, Latest Updated CHCM Labs Is What You Need To Take, Sale JN0-570 Exam Materials Is Updated Daily, ITexam-Answers 101-350 Practice Test With Low Price, Certforall 70-552-CSHARP Pdf Download For All Candidates From All Over The World, Exam-Labs 070-512-VB Test Software Online Sale, Most Hottest 920-167 Vce Files Online, We Have 920-464 Exam Sample Questions For Download, Prompt Updates 1Z0-881 Actual Questions Are Based On The Real Exam, Buy Discount CX-310-231 Cert Exam Is The Best Material, Buy Best 1Z1-211 Test Software Is Your Best Choice, Real PC0-001 Test For All Candidates From All Over The World, 50% Discount 3X0-203 Test Dump On Our Store, Prompt Updates 251-307 Guide , Sale VCP410 Certification Material With Accurate Answers, 100% Pass Rate 190-702 Exam Vce On Our Store,

male enhancement: what is the best depression medication heart disease and erectile dysfunction revatio for ed how much is penis surgery penile vacuum pump natural ways to make penis larger how to enlarge pennis size sex tablet pills to make penis grow prostate meds over the counter penis enlargment before and after average penis size flaccid stretching sizes d herbs reviews average penis length in us taking testosterone shots steel pills how to get an erection on coke king size supplement buy silagra online viagra substitute cvs cialis and alcohol zinc for penis roman pharmacy biggest penis size enlarge penis pill adverage penis size gmc fitness store cheap cialis online dysfunctions meaning l arginine for ed reviews test max nutrition review how to get a hard on naturally when will my penis get bigger chinese medicine for ed how to grow your dick naturally hims review reddit how to make your dick wider why am i not interested in sex how can i get my penis bigger bad times at the el royale redbox herbal supplements male enhancement walmart mens cheap penis extender stay active increase sexual performance suboxone sexual side effects l 80 pill testosterone by age how to get harder erection naturally m drive elite reviews tablet ratings clit after testosterone treatment what does a dick look like best tablet reviews 2020 pro t plus male enhancement i want to make my dick bigger names for viagra

vape: vape shops york pa vaping coughing e cig and vape cheap drip tanks best fruity vape juice uwell crown style how to get the last out of your vape cartridge hot girl smokin vape meme gay voopoo drag 2 charging issue glass globe vape best all in one box mod usb looking vape how to break in new uwell crown coils low nicotine vape juice joy e tech vape vapor pen explosion jaydes vapor lounge ecig bundles best vape for cloud chasing how much is blu e cigarette cost acetone vapor chamber size long standard v2 e cigarette difference between e cigarettes and vaping how replicate vaping snow wolf vapes vaping ban fda voopoo rex guide pdf joy of vaping variant vape mod vaporizer pen cheap sale vape juice mech mod explosion affordable vape small e cig mods notch coils vaoe shop cheap juul starter kit kangertech topbox mini starter kit lost vape orion q review cascade 1 sticker paper box e cigarette what are vaping mods dripper vape pen custard shoppe ceramic ccell coil triple crown e juice pod style vape how to tell if juul is charged aspire tank coil change uwell crown coils nickel helix atomizer glass for uwell crown iii mountain dew vape juice voopoo drag 2 manual vapor records how to refill voopoo panda pods smokeless smoking

cbd oil: plus cbd source cbd oil cbd schizophrenia cbd brand vape pen cbd world travel lodge melbourne cbd cbd oil and multiple sclerosis cbd pax era pods how to use cbd isolate powder emu cbd what cbd how good is te brand of cbd oil creating better daysil cbd farms cb2 shop chest how long does it take for cbd to take effect metabolix wellness center does cbd relax muscles bronchiectasis cbd oil cbd australia sydney glycine combat sub for sale can cbd oil help lose weight amazon cbd products cbd louisville physicians formula organic wear cc cream cbd hemp oil concentrate best dosage cbd thc oil for pain cbd halflife 100mg cbd oil for sale cbd oil from shark tank is cbd a depressant or stimulant cbd size ultrasound nordic oil cbd cannabis oil medical uses voiding dysfunction cannabis in hindi cbd digestion best e juice recipes 2015 cbd king marijuana i doser full spectrum hemp oil is it different than cbd real scientific hemp oil review guest houses in nairobi cbd cbd oil for autoimmune diseases weed side effects next day ultracell cbd oil zilis pill pens cbd oil pharmacokinetics cbd and ibuprofen interaction eco exchange cbd oil affect definiton cbd oil for itchy wellness effects cbd and thc oil for sale in carlsbad ca walmart vape pen what can full spectrum cbd oil do for me will cbd oil make you fail a drug test cbd oil 3rd party lab tested research on cbd oil