Andrew Sullivan punts a dumb conspiracy theory so we don’t have to.
Andrew Sullivan punts a dumb conspiracy theory so we don’t have to.
JFK Facts is the premier destination on the Web for high-quality information and reasoned debate about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
We are supported by the Mary Ferrell Foundation and readers like you.
Your financial contribution will sustain independent voices and research on this key moment in American history.
The site is dedicated to improving media coverage and public understanding of JFK's assassination, educating the young, and demanding the release of records still held in secret by U.S. government agencies.
More about us here.
All donations are tax deductible.
Jefferson Morley, author and former Washington Post reporter, is the moderator of JFK Facts.
Morley has written about the JFK story for national publications including the Post, New York Times, New York Review of Books, Slate, Salon, TheAtlantic.com, and the Washington Monthly. He won the 2009 PEN/Oakland Censorship Award for his JFK reporting. He is author of "Our Man in Mexico; Winston Scott and the Hidden History of the CIA" (University Press of Kansas, 2008).
Rex Bradford is the webmaster of JFK Facts, He is creator of MaryFerrell.org, the most comprehensive Web site of government records on the assassinations of JFK, Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King.
Insider's guide: Best JFK Web sites
Take a look Best JFK photo Web sites
Must to avoid: Worst JFK Web sites
You'll want to visit:
John F. Kennedy Library and Museum
Scene of the crime:
Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza
Watch the Zapruder film:
The famous home movie of the assassination (warning: graphic imagery).
First official story:
Warren Commission Report (1964)
Second official story:
House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) Report (1979)
Oliver Stone's "JFK": What do historians think?
JFK books: Rated by Goodreads
Bookstore: Search JFK titles here
Share recollections and photos of 1963 on our Memories page.
We're looking for experts in all aspects of the JFK story (history, photography, medical, forensic) to respond in writing to reader's questions.
Almost every person who thinks the moon landing was faked has a better understanding of the JFK assassination than huge swaths of the media and academia. Because every single one of moon landing hoaxers thinks the government murdered JFK.
So who is more coo-coo crazy here? The poorly informed folks at the supermarket check out like who think the moon landing was faked … or someone like Chris Matthews (lone nutter killed JFK), Joe Califano (Castro did it), Bobby Ray Inman (Castro did it), Michael Barone (lone nut did it), Robert Dallek (lone nut), Robert Caro (not a “hint” of LBJ involvement). Name 100 more CFR types.
The vast majority of Council on Foreign Relations commentators on the JFK assassination have an understanding of that event roughly equivalent to the moon hoaxers & the Holocaust deniers.
The bipartisan elites have their own fantasies.
I have noticed the media has started leaving out JFK assassination theories in their list of “crazy” conspiracy theories. The younger ones have been doing some reading and the older ones are still stuck in the mud.
In the capacious annals of unconvincing JFK arguments, your ranks high Robert.
Some subset of the people who have “good understanding” of JFK’s assassination also believe that the moon landing was faked. I notice that you wisely do not include yourself in their ranks. My view is that people the moon walk of 1969 was staged are not people who should be trusted on issues of large historical significance.
They may be nice people, and they may have interesting things to say about the JFK story, but I hope, as a group, they will stay out of the JFK debate.
I know of 2 JFK researchers who think the moon landings were faked: James Fetzer and Jack White (deceased).
Both of these men have and excellent broad understanding of the JFK assassination: they think Lyndon Johnson, US intelligence and the outside shadow government murdered JFK for various reasons, both personal and ideological.
Many quality JFK researchers believe that 9/11 was an inside job. I think there is almost no evidence to support 9/11 being an inside job.
“Moon hoax” and “9/11 inside job” beliefs are straw arguments often used to attack some of the best, most knowledgeable JFK researchers.
The flip side is one could easy say an establishment “lone nutter” is a crazy kook, the equal of a Holocaust denier, 9/11 truther or a moon hoaxer advocate… and thus should not be listened to on anything.
I choose not to do that.
I think it is best to judge each theory, argument and political researcher on their own merits and not use straw arguments as a basis for credibility.
Ed Tatro is one of the best JFK researchers of all time as well as a careful researcher. I am not going to hold it against him that he is also a 9/11 truther, too.