Fact check: Did the Fed kill JFK?

No. Read this unpersuasive (some would say nutty) article and you will find proof that even the piously Paulite advocates of this theory have no actual evidence for it.


  1. “JFKFacts.org welcomes comments that are factual, engaging, and civil.”

    I happen to be a Ron Paul supporter. In fact, I was a key Ron Paul organizer in Austin, TX (a hotbed of Ron Paul supporters) in 2008 and 2012. Ron Paul got 23% of the vote in the GOP primary in Travis County (where Austin is) in 2012.

    I can say as a FACT that Ron Paul supporters are much, much, much more factually grounded in the JFK assassination than just about demographic group I know.

    In fact, at a Ron Paul fundraiser in 2009 here in Austin, I actually polled the audience, on an individual one by one basis, as to who they thought who murdered John Kennedy. I went to every table with a notepad and tabulated results of my question “Who killed JFK?”

    The overwhelming majority said the CIA, Lyndon Johnson and/or the government murdered John Kennedy. Almost no one said the Federal Reserve. A minority said the mafia. Perhaps 1/20 thought Lee Harvey Oswald a lone nut did it.

    Poor Ron Paul himself hazarded a guess “Fidel Castro” (with his blowback theory of the JFK assassination). Ron Paul probably has greatly changed his mind by today. In the 2012 primaries he said the US government had lied about the JFK assassination.

    Lew Rockwell runs a libertarian web page that often covers the JFK assassination. Most of the articles there are pretty good, including one that I written (an earlier versiion of “LBJ-CIA Aassassination of JFK.”)

    Yes, there are Paulites who believe the Federal Reserve killed JFK and, yes, that is a baloney theory. The greater majority of Paulites are much better informed on the JFK assassination, perhaps more so than any political segment of American society, except JFK assassination researchers themselves.

    They have figured out that the government murdered John Kennedy and covered it up.

    As for the “nutty” theories on the JFK assassination, just google the hilarious suspect views of any member of the CIA influenced Council on Foreign Relations for the past 49 years. I am referring to the views of folks like George Will, Charles Krauthammer, Jack Valenti, Bill Moyers name 100 other CFR members. The establishment CFR, besides the New York Times, is the #1 “nutty” source for disinformation on the JFK assassnination. Almost to a man they believe the beyond hilarious notion that a lone nutter killed JFK and he in turn was killed by a non-mafia related lone nutter for no apparent reason. A scattering like CFR Arnold de Borchgrave think Russians did or “Fidel Castro” like “Mr. Intelligence” Bobby Ray Inman personally told me.

    Bottom line: most Ron Paulers are very well grounded in the facts of the JFK assassination. The “nuts” are the ones in the bipartisan establishment that have been covering this up for 49 years.

    And, no, the Fed did not kill JFK.

  2. jeffmorley says:

    People who are “informed” about the JFK assassination who say that the Federal Reserve was involved are not “informed” at all. They are misinformed.

    The fact that many Paulites believe Lyndon Johnson was guilty of conspiracy in a legal sense–ie convictable by the unanimous verdict of a jury of his peers–is far-fetched. Twelve people might convict LBJ in a libertarian chat group but not among the public at large.

    I doubt very much that twelve people drawn at random would convict LBJ of conspiracy based on the available evidence.

    • Most of the people (Paulites at a Ron Paul fundraiser) I talked to thought the CIA killed JFK. Lyndon Johnson ran in second. Mafia third. A few scatterings of the Fed. Ron Paul himself was the only person in the room to guess “Fidel Castro.” This was in 2009 – I am sure Ron Paul has probably moved into the government did it camp by now.

      80% of my sample thought some form of the government killed JFK.

      There are some Paulites who think the Fed killed JFK. But I am a Ron Pauler and I don’t.

  3. Donna Coe says:

    Hello Robert,

    I’m particulary interested in your comment that Ron Paulers are very well grounded in the facts about who assassinated JFK. I’ve been a Ron Paul supporter since 1999 and I have, for longer than I care to admit, done considerable research on the JFK assassination.

    It wasn’t until after reading “JFK and the Unspeakable, Why He Died and Why It Matters”, by James W. Douglas that I stopped asking who assassinated JFK and started asking why JFK was assassinated. If you haven’t read this book, I hope when your time allows you will take a closer look. The below link provides my brief and very humble assessment of Mr. Douglass’ book. It was was posted on Lew Rockwell’s blog back in June.

    Once again, your comment that Ron Paulers are well grounded in the facts about JFK’s assassination truly caught my attention. It just so happens, albeit for different yet similar reasons, I have very high regard for both men.

    My best regards,

    Donna Coe
    Park City, UT


  4. Jonathan says:

    If one believes as I do that the assassination of JFK was a coup that had its beginning in the highest reaches of American power, one naturally seeks to understand who occupied the highest reaches of American power in the early 1960s.

    Fed Chairman William McChesney Martin certainly occupied a pinnacle of power.

    There’s no suggestion in the historical record he was connected to the assassination. But there’s also no question he was a member of the power elite.

  5. Did the FED plan and execute the coup that killed Kennedy? No.

    Does ANYTHING happen in this country that is not given the go ahead by the power elite who pull the strings? No.

    Was Kennedy confronting the money powers? Absolutely.

  6. Juan says:

    Anyone who has hunted and killed animals, and has seen the Zapruder film knows the head shot was from the front. Oswald did not kill JFK.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In seeking to expand the range of informed debate about the events of 1963 and its aftermath, JFKFacts.org welcomes comments that are factual, engaging, and civil. more